Lesson 4 of 81970–19968 min
The bias–variance trade-off and regularisation
In 1970 Arthur Hoerl and Robert Kennard, working at DuPont, published a paper in Technometrics with a provocative title: “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems”. When predictors are strongly correlated, the least-squares coefficients become huge, unstable and change sign from one sample to the next.
Their remedy was to accept a little bias on purpose, adding a penalty that shrinks the coefficients, in return for a large drop in variance. Statisticians had been taught that an unbiased estimator was the virtuous one. Hoerl and Kennard showed that on average a biased one could be closer to the truth.
The rest of this lesson is part of Pro
Create a free account to read the first lesson of every path, and go Pro for the rest.
Sources
- Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems (A. E. Hoerl, R. W. Kennard, Technometrics 12(1), 1970) — Technometrics
- Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso (R. Tibshirani, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58(1), 1996) — Journal of the Royal Statistical Society
- Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma (S. Geman, E. Bienenstock, R. Doursat, Neural Computation 4(1), 1992) — MIT Press